Satellite Re-entry Events

Is there a distinct difference between climate change and industrial pollution? Using research, data and projections, the next cataclysmic world crisis on Mother Earth might simply be avoided by understanding the difference between natural weather cycles and greed. A March 2025 simulation concluded recent polar vortex shifting may be the result of radiation released from re-entering satellite metals. Our glaciers greatly impact polar vortexes around the world. When arctic glaciers melt, methane gasses are released and...
-parts of the planet get warmer;
-parts of the planet get colder;
-parts of the planet get wetter;
-and parts of the planet get drier.

As scientist continue to study previous ice ages; they are being very attuned as to whether outside forces may be contributing to present weather cycles. Many charts are showing not only is Mother Earth heading towards another ice age with her warming patterns; but moving in that direction at a faster pace than previous climate re-cycling. Could this increased rate be industrial pollution?

Some geologist and astrophysics are putting out an alarm on what has recently become known as satellite re-entry events. Being, if these events are indeed putting un-natural amounts of metals like aluminum oxide into our atmosphere; maybe our jet streams are affected?

Some estimate, that by the year 2040, re-entering burned out satellite pollution may become the major contributor to climate changes and weather as they impact polar vortexes. And why aren't we surprised that studies suggests most shifts to climate and weather, by the changing of chemistry in our stratosphere, will primarily impact life on the equator and southern hemisphere? We only have one planet.

What we know is: in last year, some 525 low earth orbiting (LEO) satellites re-entered the stratosphere upon the end of their five year life span. As these artificial meteorites burn while falling towards us, accumulations of metals like aluminum oxide are being dissipated. This cosmic pollution will most likely reside in the stratosphere for as much as 30-years... eating at earth's ozone layers. An article on the website HeavensAbove details how aluminum oxide is known to activate a chloride that depletes layers in the ozone that protect the planet from harmful radiation. Not only does the byproduct of burned out LOE satellites impact ozone layers; but by heating up the stratosphere with radiation, earth's climate and weather patterns are indeed impacted.

According to an article in SpaceWeather.com, approximately four to five LEO satellites are retired per day; and their metals become orbiting pollution. And the Gen1 (generation 1) satellites are being replaced by upgrades at a rate of 50 per week. It is projected major industries will have launched as many as 73,000 new satellites into earth's low orbits by 2030. If these Gen 2 satellites are due for retirement and re-entry within a five to seven-year lifespan... artificial meteorite events are going to get very interesting in the next ten years. Tech-giant goals for 2030 include:

SpaceX-Starlink: 42,000-satellites;
China-Qianfan: 15,000-satellites;
China-Guowang: 13,000-satellites;

Amazon-Project Kuiper: 3,200-satellites.

And we note both Starlink and Amazon (AWS) are used for United States military functionality.

The fact that Gen 1 satellites are retiring their metals to earth's immediate atmosphere on a regular basis is backed by asteroid and meteorite studies. It is being reported that 10% of all asteroid/meteorite dusk being studied today consist of aluminum oxide, sulfuric acid, lithium and copper to name a few. These new metals are easily distinguishable compared to “natural” rock based asteroid dust of sodium, magnesium, nickel and iron.

Tens of thousands of aged LOE satellites returning to earth is one concern. But with so many satellites being launched... is it possible they may start running into each other? The Kessler Syndrome was projected as far back as 1978; describing how the colliding effect of LEO satellites may one day destroy the entire network as designed. But it seems Kessler's concern is being ignored???

The dangers of satellite re-entry events is pure and simple industrial pollution that constitutes environmental injustice! Recently, many have noticed their air quality index (AQI), as provided by weather applications, indicates a measure for Particulate Matter Less Than 2.5 Microns. What's in this PM2.5 reading? It can't be natural can it? Is it too early to know for sure if breathing these PM2.5 particles are safe?

And so now and immediately, We as human beings must question the real cost for demanding faster internet for AI products, streaming services and crypto. Knowing a depleted ozone can create an increased risk of cancers and radiation poisoning; the easy answer must be We adjust Our lives to be as safe as possible. We wear natural sunscreens on our skin and in our clothing when outside... even at night. Keeping aware of harmful UV levels while outdoors is smart. Then, We must economically boycott these mass launchings of LOE satellites. And We must demand our legislators stop selling out Our Environment for militarization and profit. Industrial pollution falling from the sky by retiring satellites is not negotiable. To do nothing is to be complicit and ignore dangers to Our health and wellness. Next generations deserve our diligence to keep Our planet as safe as we naturally can. Continued research and facts hold the key to Truth, Love and Justice.

Links to content resources:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P29F7LAtqzc&t=89s

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2024JD042442

https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2313374120

https://heavens-above.com/?lat=0&lng=0&loc=Unspecified&alt=0&tz=UCT

https://heavens-above.com/StarLink.aspx

https://www.space.com/kessler-syndrome-space-debris

https://spaceweather.com/archive.php?view=1&day=05&month=08&year=2025

https://www.iqair.com/us/